The period since the global financial crisis has exposed some areas of serious illegal and immoral conduct within western banking systems. Drawing on interviews with more than 150 individuals working in financial services as well as regulators, politicians, and lawyers, this book explains what has and hasn't changed in bank culture.

The period since the Global Financial Crisis and numerous scandals have exposed some areas of serious illegal and unethical conduct within western banking systems. Despite extensive reforms it is increasingly apparent however that there is a persistent problem with the 'culture' of banking in Anglo-America. US and UK state managers made substantial efforts to reform the culture of their banking sectors. However, this book argues that they focused on an extremely narrow definition of bank culture. They did so for two reasons: firstly, because the structural pressures of financialization - which are a far more important driver of the problematic features of bank culture in Anglo-America - are harder to remedy; but secondly, state managers also used their bank culture response to tackle a legitimacy crisis facing their institutions of government. In so doing they abdicated responsibility for the real problems - of inequality and instability - associated with their respective financial systems Drawing on interviews with more than 150 individuals working in financial services as well as regulators, politicians, and lawyers, The Bank Culture Debate explains the strategies employed by state managers before then examining what has and has not changed in the culture of banking in the US and UK.

The Bank Culture Debate marks a significant step forward in our understanding of the crises in Financial services. It shows that the financialisation' of the AngloAmerican model of banking shows a deep structural fault line that a focus on culture and conduct goes only a fraction of the way to address. A must read for anyone wanting to understand both the last crisis... and the next one.